By Jeffrey Saut, Chief Investment Strategist RJF, Tuesday 21st February 2017
By the time a queen bee is five she is old and no longer reproduces, leaving her army of honeybees torn between loyalty and survival. Since the hive cannot survive without a productive queen, the beekeeper reaches into the hive with a long-gloved hand and squashes the enfeebled queen. With the entire hive as a witness, all know the queen is dead. Absent the scent of their leader, the honeybees panic. But, the beekeeper is prepared, having ordered a new queen from a bee breeder. Arriving in a two-inch-long wooden box with a screen at the top and bottom, the queen is accompanied by a court of six to eight escort bees who care for her every whim, cleaning her, feeding her, removing her waste. At one end of the box a tiny piece of hard candy blocks access to the queen. When the box is inserted into the hive, the first instinct of the worker bees, who immediately know she has the wrong scent, is to kill the new queen. The workers struggle to reach her, but are blocked by the candy. Soon they become diverted by the sweet [candy], and over the two or three days it takes to eat through it they succumb to the enticement. Their fealty is won. All hail the new queen.
“Three Blind Mice” by Ken Auletta (American writer, journalist and media critic)
Something similar to this “new queen bee” story is happening now. The “old queen” has been the Federal Reserve and monetary policy. The “new queen” appears to be the White House and fiscal policy. The White House seems nervous that monetary policy, the Fed, and up until recently the continuing policy of lowering interest rates, has not produced the typical strong economic rebound following a “soft patch.” So, the “new queen” looks to be fiscal policy and the White House. As repeatedly stated, “The White House is ‘driving’ the equity markets and not the Fed, which is a huge change from the past two decades.” Now Wall Street loved the old queen. The Street loved lower interest rates, figuring that stimulation would revive the banks, business, and the economy in general. Yet many investors are leery about the new queen. The Street worries that tax cuts could be a catalyst for bigger budget deficits and higher inflation. Moreover, the media, the Democrats, and even many Republicans appear to be taking every opportunity to undermine our new President. However, the White House figures that Wall Street will eventually succumb to the sweet lure of tax cuts, reduced regulation, repatriation of foreign corporate profits, a fix for Obamacare, etc. But, beekeepers sometimes get stung! The head beekeeper in Washington D.C., the President, knows that the economy remains in a fragile state. He knows the worker bees are worried about their jobs, their hive, and their honey. He knows they will sting Republicans in the next election if he does not get the economy moving again, but we think he will.
Wall Street is also worried about getting stung. The Street has bid the S&P 500 (SPX/2351.16) up ~30% from last year’s February lows, and up nearly 10% from the Presidential election lows, with many indices doing better than that. So what’s driving the Trump rally? Well, as the always insightful Craig White, portfolio manager of the Canada-based HugganWhite Wealth Management organization, writes:
We agree with point 1, except we do not think infrastructure spending will occur quickly. The majority of infrastructure spending happens at the state and local level, so it is hard to envision how the government can wave a magic wand and immediately foster such spending. Recall that when the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) was passed it took a long time before the first dollars “showed up.” Point 2 we clearly agree with since we remain of the view the “profits trough” occurred in the 2Q16 and the equity markets are/have transitioned from an interest rate driven to an earnings driven, secular bull market. Indeed, as of last Friday, of the S&P 500 companies that had reported 4Q16 earnings, aggregate earnings improved by 7.5% with 69% of those companies reporting better than expected numbers. Three, if you believe S&P’s 2017 earnings estimate for the S&P 500, and that for every one point drop in the corporate tax rate hypothetically adds $1.31 to those earnings, stocks are not all that expensive. Four, there is little doubt the economy is getting better. Five, hereto there is little doubt small business optimism has soared. Six, investors poured nearly $18 billion into equity mutual funds and exchange-traded funds in the week of February 15. And seven, sentiment is profoundly ebullient, which is actually a cause for some near-term concern.
The call for this week: Vince Lombardi once opined, “I never lost a game. I was only behind when time ran out!” And that appears to be the operative quote for me and my short/intermediate models over the past few weeks since the SPX has overrun my models’ maximum upside trading target of 2330, as well as “Trumping” the models’ downside window of vulnerability slated for late January/early February. Indeed, since the election the SPX has not experienced a 1.5% drawdown on a closing basis from a closing high. In fact, the SPX has gone 89 sessions without even a 1% decline. To be sure, the equity markets have thumbed their collective noses at: a negative astrological sign where on February 10/11 we got a Snow Moon; a Lunar Eclipse, and a Comet (Snow Moon); negative Treasury tax receipts for the first time since the financial crisis; a raging battle between the White House and the intelligence community and the media; rising inflation; a more hawkish Fed; an overbought condition; hints of protectionism; a downside “island gap” in the SPX chart; and a historically low Volatility Index (VIX). To this VIX point, the longest dated VIX futures contract (October 2017) traded below 17 recently. This is a fairly rare event and tends to be associated with “trading tops.” Furthermore, this type of recent panic buying is strongly correlated with the kind of buying you see toward the end of a trend and not the beginning of a new upside trend. Still, in this business price is reality and the reality is we have gotten wrong-footed over the past few weeks. Fortunately, most of the stocks featured in these reports have continued to do well. One that has lagged, and remains positively rated by our fundamental analysts, is Premier, Inc. (PINC/$31.35/Outperform), a healthcare improvement company. Additionally, we talked to a wicked smart, healthcare-centric portfolio manager last week who suggested we take a closer look at Mylan N.V. (MYL/$42.05/ Strong Buy), which screens well on our models and carries a favorable rating from our fundamental analyst. For more information please see our analysts’ reports. This morning the S&P 500 preopening futures are higher again by about 5.50 points on no real overnight news.
Additional information is available on request. This document may not be reprinted without permission.
Raymond James & Associates may make a market in stocks mentioned in this report and may have managed/co-managed a public/follow-on offering of these shares or otherwise provided investment banking services to companies mentioned in this report in the past three years.
RJ&A or its officers, employees, or affiliates may 1) currently own shares, options, rights or warrants and/or 2) execute transactions in the securities mentioned in this report that may or may not be consistent with this report’s conclusions.
The opinions offered by Mr. Saut should be considered a part of your overall decision-making process. For more information about this report – to discuss how this outlook may affect your personal situation and/or to learn how this insight may be incorporated into your investment strategy – please contact your Raymond James Wealth Manager.
All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Equity Research Department of Raymond James & Associates at this time and are subject to change. Information has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but we do not guarantee that the material presented is accurate or that it provides a complete description of the securities, markets or developments mentioned. Other Raymond James departments may have information that is not available to the Equity Research Department about companies mentioned. We may, from time to time, have a position in the securities mentioned and may execute transactions that may not be consistent with this presentation’s conclusions. We may perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking business from, any company mentioned. Investments mentioned are subject to availability and market conditions. All yields represent past performance and may not be indicative of future results. Raymond James & Associates, Raymond James Financial Services and Raymond James Ltd. are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial.
International securities involve additional risks such as currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic instability. These risks are greater in emerging markets.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of mutual funds carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about mutual funds. The prospectus is available from your wealth manager and should be read carefully before investing.
Black MondayOn 19 October 1987, the stock markets experienced a dramatic plunge that prompted many firms to shut down their trading desks and turn off their phones to minimize internal losses. Raymond James refused to do the same. Our desks stayed open to help meet clients’ needs, resulting in our first and only unprofitable quarter since the firm went public in 1983. |
 |
Who was Raymond James?The Raymond in our name is actually from Edward Raymond, owner of a 15-employee mutual fund sales group, Raymond and Associates, along Florida’s west coast. He sold his company to Bob James on 15 July 1964, on condition that the surviving firm be called Raymond, James & Associates. Three days after the sale, Ed Raymond was involved in a near-fatal automobile accident and never joined the firm. Nonetheless, even after Raymond had passed away, Bob James insisted that his name remain on the door – ahead of James’ own. That was a promise he made to Ed Raymond three days before the accident, and Bob James was a man who kept his promises. |
|
Bear Market of 1974The severe bear market of 1974 threatened the existence of Raymond James, which was bleeding capital by the day. Tom James, his father and other leaders took extreme measures to keep the firm afloat, slashing costs, foregoing paychecks and even attempting to sell the firm for just enough capital to protect client assets and retain as many associates as possible. The story could have ended very differently if not for a sharp upturn and continued rebound in the stock markets late in the year. |
|
Taking Raymond James PublicWhen consideration was being given to taking Raymond James public, Tom James penned a letter to shareholders (largely employees at the time). ” … the public offering should be considered as a statement of our independence. While this is a psychological rather than an economic rationale, it is nonetheless very important. We have asserted for some time that we are not interested in becoming a small part of a very large corporation. That assertion results mainly from the inclinations of management rather than the economic benefits associated with either alternative. The public stock offering affords us the opportunity to enjoy a little bit of the best of both worlds. While shareholders will be given liquidity at fair market value, we will still have the ability to control our own destiny.” After 40+ years of Tom’s leadership, upon becoming CEO, Paul Reilly was often questioned about whether the company might ultimately surrender its cherished independence and be acquired by some larger entity. His response: “Not while I’m around.” It’s a theme that continues today. |
 |
