By Jeffrey Saut, Chief Investment Strategist RJF, Tuesday 7th February 2017
“You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life.”
. . . Winston Churchill
I recalled the aforementioned quote while reading a rather interesting article by the always erudite Peggy Noonan. The article was titled “In Trump’s Washington, Nothing Feels Stable.” Ms. Noonan goes on to write:
We are living through big history and no one here knows where it’s going or how this period ends. Everyone, left, right and center, feels the earth is unsteady under their feet. Too much is happening. Democratic senators boycott confirmation hearings, Iran tests ballistic missiles, President Trump has testy phone calls with prime ministers and it’s quickly leaked to the press, the president tells Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to “go nuclear” — meaning use the so-called nuclear option to get the new Supreme Court nominee through. . . . Everyone’s political views are now emotions and everyone now wears their emotions on their faces. People are speaking more loudly and quickly than usual. At parties, dinners and gatherings the decibel level hits the ceiling right away and stays there. No one can hear anything. It somehow seemed right that a 25-pound bobcat escaped from the National Zoo; a Washington Post columnist speculated it fled to Canada.
I used some of Ms. Noonan’s first paragraph in said article, because “Everyone, left, right and center,” does indeed “feel the earth is unsteady under their feet.” I have lived through 12 presidents in my life, and I have never seen anything like what is currently happening. I am sure somewhere in U.S. history there has been other protests against presidents, but I can’t recall anything like what we are seeing now. The acrimony is palpable and suggests the president is in trouble. That statement brings back memories of a market axiom from my departed friend Richard Russell (Dow Theory Letters) who used to write – when the president is in trouble, the stock market is in trouble – something participants might want to consider. Verily, there is the potential that the stock market may begin to realize that the unprecedented acrimony could impair President Trump’s agenda. Obviously, it took a step in that direction over the weekend when a federal judge ordered the halt of the president’s travel suspension executive order. It will be interesting to see the stock market’s reaction to that news this week.
Last week, however, the equity markets were on their “heels” until Friday’s better-than-expected employment report saved the day. The Friday Fling, of roughly 187 Dow points, left the senior index virtually flat for the week. But that “fling” was driven almost entirely by the financial sector. For example, the rally in Goldman Sachs’ shares accounted for 72 of the Dow Wow points and, when combined with three other financial stocks, accounted for 124 of the Dow’s ~187 point gain. Of course, that sits well with Andrew Adams and me, since financials, energy and technology are three of the macro sectors we have suggested overweighting in portfolios. Speaking to technology, it is worth noting that, so far in this earnings season, 81% of the reporting companies in the tech sector have beaten the consensus earnings estimates, and 69% have bettered the consensus revenue estimates by (chart 1). As for the energy sector, 58% of reporting companies came in above earnings’ estimates and 68% beat the revenue estimates. Meanwhile, the financial sector saw an earnings and revenue beat rate of 66% and 55%, respectively. Overall, with some 1,000 companies reporting, 65% have beaten earnings estimates and 56% have better revenues estimates (chart 2). All of this “foots” with our sense that the secular bull market is transitioning from one that is interest rate driven to one that is earnings driven.
Continuing with this earnings season theme, there were more triple plays last week. That would be companies that beat earnings and revenue estimates and raised forward guidance. In addition to those companies for your consideration offered in last Monday’s missive that are triple plays, favorably rated by our fundamental analysts, and screen positively on our models (NFLX/$140.25/Outperform, NOW/$89.47/Strong Buy, BABA/$100.39/Strong Buy), last week, these companies also met those same metrics: MarineMax (HZO/$20.70/Strong Buy), American Financial (AFG/$90.81/Outperform), and Cavium Networks (CAVM/$66.95/Strong Buy).
Plainly, last Friday’s employment report breathed new life into the recently-sagging equity markets. Indeed, nonfarm Payrolls rose by 227,000, well above the median forecast of +175,000, with some anticipation of an upside surprise (chart 3). To that report, our economist, Scott Brown Ph.D., writes:
A good report, but this is January data (payrolls fell by 2.95 million before seasonal adjustment). (Adjusted) payrolls exceeded expectations, although largely offset by downward revisions to the previous data. The increase in labor force participation is a good sign, but still little changed over the last year. Average hourly earnings rose mildly, but these figures are choppy (the trend is gradually higher). Nothing here to suggest that the Fed needs to slam on the brakes, but consistent with a gradual pace of policy normalization (that is higher short-term interest rates). Market reaction is likely to be a bit mixed. The economic calendar will be thin until March 15, when we get CPI, retail, sales, industrial production, and more importantly, Yellen’s monetary policy testimony.
In addition to the strong employment report, we would note that the overall economic numbers are getting better. As the Bespoke organization writes:
Earlier this week we got the monthly ISM Manufacturing reading, and it posted a very strong number of 56. As shown in the chart below [chart 4], this is a sharp move higher from levels seen a year ago. Unfortunately, the Prices Paid inflation reading in this month’s ISM Manufacturing report spiked up to 69 as well, which was the highest reading seen since 2011. Surely the Fed took notice.
Clearly the reflation trades should continue to have upside “legs.” Bolstering the “reflation trade” is the recent weakness in the U.S. Dollar Index (chart 5), which could put a bid under the sectors with more international revenue exposure (chart 6).
The call for this week: Bullish sentiment across all venues is extreme (read: bearishly). Selling Pressure rose last week as Buying Power declined. According to the astute Lowry’s service, there has not been a 90% Upside Day since November 7, 2016. The stock market is overbought on a short-term basis. Our method of measuring the stock market’s “internal energy” is down to levels rarely seen (out of gas), and our short/intermediate models continue to counsel for caution. That said, Friday’s Fling may extend the rally attempt, but we do not think the S&P 500 gets very far above the 2300 mark. And remember, February historically tends to be a tough month for the equity markets (chart 7).
P.S.: Helene Meisler @hmeisler: Holy cow. ETF put/call ratio was 44% [Extreme optimism/panic buying]
Additional information is available on request. This document may not be reprinted without permission.
Raymond James & Associates may make a market in stocks mentioned in this report and may have managed/co-managed a public/follow-on offering of these shares or otherwise provided investment banking services to companies mentioned in this report in the past three years.
RJ&A or its officers, employees, or affiliates may 1) currently own shares, options, rights or warrants and/or 2) execute transactions in the securities mentioned in this report that may or may not be consistent with this report’s conclusions.
The opinions offered by Mr. Saut should be considered a part of your overall decision-making process. For more information about this report – to discuss how this outlook may affect your personal situation and/or to learn how this insight may be incorporated into your investment strategy – please contact your Raymond James Wealth Manager.
All expressions of opinion reflect the judgment of the Equity Research Department of Raymond James & Associates at this time and are subject to change. Information has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but we do not guarantee that the material presented is accurate or that it provides a complete description of the securities, markets or developments mentioned. Other Raymond James departments may have information that is not available to the Equity Research Department about companies mentioned. We may, from time to time, have a position in the securities mentioned and may execute transactions that may not be consistent with this presentation’s conclusions. We may perform investment banking or other services for, or solicit investment banking business from, any company mentioned. Investments mentioned are subject to availability and market conditions. All yields represent past performance and may not be indicative of future results. Raymond James & Associates, Raymond James Financial Services and Raymond James Ltd. are wholly-owned subsidiaries of Raymond James Financial.
International securities involve additional risks such as currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic instability. These risks are greater in emerging markets.
Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, and charges and expenses of mutual funds carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about mutual funds. The prospectus is available from your wealth manager and should be read carefully before investing.
Black MondayOn 19 October 1987, the stock markets experienced a dramatic plunge that prompted many firms to shut down their trading desks and turn off their phones to minimize internal losses. Raymond James refused to do the same. Our desks stayed open to help meet clients’ needs, resulting in our first and only unprofitable quarter since the firm went public in 1983. |
 |
Who was Raymond James?The Raymond in our name is actually from Edward Raymond, owner of a 15-employee mutual fund sales group, Raymond and Associates, along Florida’s west coast. He sold his company to Bob James on 15 July 1964, on condition that the surviving firm be called Raymond, James & Associates. Three days after the sale, Ed Raymond was involved in a near-fatal automobile accident and never joined the firm. Nonetheless, even after Raymond had passed away, Bob James insisted that his name remain on the door – ahead of James’ own. That was a promise he made to Ed Raymond three days before the accident, and Bob James was a man who kept his promises. |
|
Bear Market of 1974The severe bear market of 1974 threatened the existence of Raymond James, which was bleeding capital by the day. Tom James, his father and other leaders took extreme measures to keep the firm afloat, slashing costs, foregoing paychecks and even attempting to sell the firm for just enough capital to protect client assets and retain as many associates as possible. The story could have ended very differently if not for a sharp upturn and continued rebound in the stock markets late in the year. |
|
Taking Raymond James PublicWhen consideration was being given to taking Raymond James public, Tom James penned a letter to shareholders (largely employees at the time). ” … the public offering should be considered as a statement of our independence. While this is a psychological rather than an economic rationale, it is nonetheless very important. We have asserted for some time that we are not interested in becoming a small part of a very large corporation. That assertion results mainly from the inclinations of management rather than the economic benefits associated with either alternative. The public stock offering affords us the opportunity to enjoy a little bit of the best of both worlds. While shareholders will be given liquidity at fair market value, we will still have the ability to control our own destiny.” After 40+ years of Tom’s leadership, upon becoming CEO, Paul Reilly was often questioned about whether the company might ultimately surrender its cherished independence and be acquired by some larger entity. His response: “Not while I’m around.” It’s a theme that continues today. |
 |
